Gaslighting Upward: When Employees Manipulate the Narrative

Gaslighting upwards

Most leaders have seen a version of this play out.

A new policy is introduced. Maybe it’s a change in process, expectations, or reporting structure. The team initially accepts it without much resistance.

But one employee begins voicing frustration.

At first it happens privately—conversations with colleagues in the hallway, comments during lunch, quiet complaints about how management “doesn’t understand how things really work.”

Then the conversations continue. And continue.

Eventually something subtle starts to happen.

People who were originally fine with the change begin questioning it. Not because their experience changed—but because the narrative around it did.

Over time, the frustration spreads.

And what started as one person’s dissatisfaction becomes something far more damaging: a slow erosion of trust in leadership.

Employees gaslighting leadership.

It’s uncomfortable to talk about because most leaders want to believe their teams operate with honesty and good intentions. But in some organizations, employees learn that manipulating the narrative can be easier than taking responsibility.

And when that happens, trust begins to erode quickly.

What Gaslighting Looks Like in the Workplace

At its core, gaslighting is a psychological tactic where someone attempts to distort reality, often by denying facts, reframing events, or shifting blame in ways that make others question their judgment.

In a workplace setting, this can show up in subtle but destructive ways.

An employee misses a deadline and insists leadership never communicated the timeline clearly.

A project fails, and the narrative quickly shifts to “management didn’t provide enough support,” even when expectations were well established.

Feedback is reframed as unfair criticism.

Accountability becomes “toxic management.”

Over time, these patterns can distort the truth about what’s actually happening inside a team or organization.

Research around workplace psychological manipulation and accountability suggests that environments where responsibility is consistently deflected often experience declining trust and performance, as leaders struggle to separate legitimate concerns from narrative management.

The Cultural Cost

When gaslighting begins to take hold inside a team, the cultural damage can be significant.

First, trust begins to erode between leadership and employees. Leaders start questioning what information they can rely on.

Second, accountability weakens. If narratives can be reshaped after the fact, it becomes harder to evaluate performance honestly.

And third, strong performers often become frustrated. When individuals who consistently deliver results see others avoid responsibility through narrative manipulation, resentment grows.

Over time, the culture shifts from one focused on ownership and improvement to one centered on deflection and perception management.

Why Leaders Often Miss It

One reason employee gaslighting can persist is that good leaders naturally want to be fair and empathetic.

When employees raise concerns, responsible managers listen. They reflect. They ask whether something could have been communicated more clearly.

That openness is usually a strength.

But it can also be exploited if individuals learn that reframing reality consistently shifts accountability away from themselves.

In those situations, leaders may find themselves repeatedly questioning their own decisions—even when the underlying issue is simply poor performance or lack of ownership.

Addressing the Problem Early

The solution is not to become defensive or dismiss employee concerns.

Healthy organizations depend on psychological safety, where people feel comfortable raising issues and challenging ideas.

But psychological safety only works when it exists alongside personal accountability.

Leaders who want to protect culture should focus on a few key practices:

Document expectations clearly.
Clarity reduces the ability to rewrite the narrative later.

Focus discussions on facts and outcomes.
Anchoring conversations in observable results helps prevent manipulation of events.

Reinforce ownership.
Strong cultures reward people who take responsibility, even when things go wrong.

Address patterns early.
When narrative manipulation becomes habitual, it can spread quickly if left unchecked.

Culture Is Built on Trust

At the end of the day, every organization relies on a shared understanding of reality.

Leaders must trust the information they receive.
Teams must trust that accountability is applied fairly.
Employees must trust that performance and behavior are evaluated honestly.

When gaslighting enters the equation—whether from leaders or employees—that trust begins to fracture.

And once trust erodes, culture rarely stays healthy for long.

The strongest organizations are not those where mistakes never happen.

They are the ones where people acknowledge reality, take responsibility, and work together to improve.


Artemis Consultants recruits elite talent for Mid to C-Level positions for emerging and established companies of all sizes. We exist for two reasons. To help companies advance and grow by recruiting highly qualified talent. And to provide people career opportunities that positively impact their lives.

Newsletter Signup

Recent Articles